Is DA14580 access to "wechat"

9 posts / 0 new
Last post
GordonLuo
Offline
Last seen:6 years 1 month ago
加入:2015-03-18 08:03
Is DA14580 access to "wechat"

As "wechat" is a very popular communication software, and I wonder DA14580 is access to "wechat"? If yes, any document or example provided? Thanks!

JE_Dialog
Offline
Last seen:1 day 7 hours ago
Staff
加入:2013-12-05 14:02
Hello Gordon, can you please

Hello Gordon, can you please make a short description of functionality you would like to achieve ?
BR JE_Dialog

GordonLuo
Offline
Last seen:6 years 1 month ago
加入:2015-03-18 08:03
Hi , here is a description

Hi , here is a description link to explain this:
http://iot.weixin.qq.com/document-4_3.html
the "wechat" software provide a easy way to access BLE, but we must according to their rule.

JE_Dialog
Offline
Last seen:1 day 7 hours ago
Staff
加入:2013-12-05 14:02
Hello Gordon, thanks for the

Hello Gordon, thanks for the link. One of our team will be in touch with you . We do have customers in production with our device who do support wechat messaging.

BR JE_Dialog

GordonLuo
Offline
Last seen:6 years 1 month ago
加入:2015-03-18 08:03
Hi, I will communicate with

Hi, I will communicate with him later! Thanks!

JE_Dialog
Offline
Last seen:1 day 7 hours ago
Staff
加入:2013-12-05 14:02
Hello Gordon, did you get

Hello Gordon, did you get WECHAT ingrated into your application ok ? we now have an example code which we can share.

BR JE_Dialog

Horace Hsieh
Offline
Last seen:2 years 8 months ago
加入:2016-05-05 16:34
Hello Sirs,

Hello Sirs,

In your sample code DA1458x_WECHAT_5.190.2, I cannot find the definition of "data_handler" structure,
Is there any header missed?
could you help to show the definition of the structure?

Thanks!

MT_dialog
Offline
Last seen:2 months 2 weeks ago
Staff
加入:2015-06-08 11:34
Hi Horace Hsieh,

Hi Horace Hsieh,

I suppose that you mean the definition in the ble_wechat_util.h file on line 25.

Thanks MT_dialog

Horace Hsieh
Offline
Last seen:2 years 8 months ago
加入:2016-05-05 16:34
Thank you very much for

Thank you very much for double check of such stupid question, as my local source code was corrupted.